This is what the ecoNazis have in mind for you – as currently being experienced in Australia:
HOUSEHOLDS face even higher power prices from January 1 as electricity retailers recover the $360 million cost of the federal renewable energy scheme.
About 370,000 AGL electricity customers will be the first hit.
From next week a 3.8 per cent increase in charges will push up customers’ annual bills by $54.
It’s the first case of a NSW provider jacking up charges to recoup the cost of buying small-scale technology certificates, or STCs, which the Federal Government is introducing to help fund a shift towards green energy.
Can’t you just hear the green weenies saying “hey its only 3.8 Percent. Everybody can afford that to SAVE THE PLANET!”. Of course, the media in Australia is even more liberal than that in the US (if that is actually possible). The actual, real news is in the last sentence:
By next winter, electricity will be about 75 per cent more expensive than just two years ago, meaning a typical family’s annual bill will be more than $1000 higher.
How many people would lose their homes to foreclosure if their electric bill came close to doubling in 2 years. And this is just the start of a long, long list of ecoFantasy energy wishes. The Ozzies still want a carbon tax and all the other green fantasies. Soon they will all be living like the aborigines who were there in the 1700s when Europeans first came to the continent.
Anybody want to raise their hands and actually admit that they believe the earth and all its population is doomed forever? Here’s one:
The world’s climate experts say that that the world’s CO2 output must peak within the next decade and then drop, very fast, if we are to reach this sort of long term reduction. In short, we have about 100 months to turn the global energy system around. The action taken must be immediate and far reaching.
Which climate experts? Oh yeah, the ones demanding tax money for funding the institutes to create studies on climate change which demand more tax money for more studies for more institutes. And after all – its just pocket change:
According to Professor Stern, climate change is likely to result in droughts and floods that will create 200 million climate refugees and it could make two-fifths of the world’s species extinct. Yet to solve it, as challenging as it may seem, would only cost 1 or 2% of global GDP. Roughly what is spent worldwide on advertising. This is pocket change for the G8. Just these eight countries between them account for about 65% of global GDP.
So what is suggested? Immediate moritorium on coal burning anywhere, an Apollo program to fund renewables, lots of money spent on reducing energy use and waste, and stop cutting down any tree anywhere. Which translates to:
Immediate reduction in available energy world-wide
lots of money for lots of fancy institutes and tests and stuff with absolutely no idea whether this work would produce energy on any kind of basis which would keep society going. The ultimate aim is really population reduction of course, but that’s not actually acknowledged.
lots of money for insulation (except for that non-green asbestos and stuff that actually works) and lots of nannying to keep everybody in the world guilty about using even one electron (up to and including public execution probably)
no more paper – which also means no more toliet paper too
In other words, pie in the sky answers pulling trillions of dollars for something that may not even give them the outcome they want – a 50% reduction in the world standard of living. However, lots of climate scientists would get lots of big freaking grants! In the belief they can actually do anything that would affect this: