Sterilize Teenage Girls

Here’s an interesting proposition mooted from the UK:

Last week, an intriguing proposition was mooted by Government minister Dawn Primarolo.

Teenage girls, she said, could be steered towards what is described as “long-term contraception”.

This is now possible thanks to the development of contraceptive jabs and implants which can last up to five years.

In other words, there is a way of effectively sterilising girls for a lengthy period of time.

At what age? Well, doesn’t 12 until 17 sound rather sensible?

Its the underlying assumption that I find most despicable. Do you own your body? Or does the government? After all, the UK government “gives” you absolutely 100% free health care. (Just don’t look too closely at what you actually get). So if the government is responsible for your health care, does that mean it should be able to control your actions and bodily functions?

This is just an extension of the thought process that treatment for smokers and fat people and sick old people costs too much and should be curtailed. Why not keep these young sluts from having babies? Just look at the positive outcomes:

  • fewer abortions – theoretically
  • no welfare payments for those illegitimate rug rats
  • lots of time for these teenagers to practice sex without getting pregnant so they will be experienced, available, and willing
  • less maternity health costs paid for by the all-knowing and kind government

While this might be considered some sort of hypothetical trial balloon to demonstrate absurdity – do you really think that there aren’t some government planners who are actually planning for this action? Of course, no one would actually try and implement mass sterilization, would they?

But remember that doctors organizations and government bureaucrats now consider it safe to say that some people should not be treated because of the choices they have made in their life.  20 years ago, would the average citizen believe that this would be considered mainstream thought?  Its funny that all the liberal hysteria about loss of freedoms completely misses the fact that the biggest loss will be coming as the “gift” of government.

Remember that this free Obambi-care or Hillarycare will change the basic standing between government and citizens. Once you give responsibility for your health care to government, government will own you and your actions.

The Real Do-Gooders and the Pseudo Do-Gooders

Their impassioned desires to make the ENTIRE world look the way THEY want it is a utopian dream – FOR A NARCISSIST!And they don’t care if their utopia is just an unrealistic dream. Or, if it’s been proven to be a nightmare in other nations, in other centuries. WHY!? Because: For the leftist, it’s more about looking like their helping, than really helping.
clipped from astuteblogger.blogspot.com

Here are a few examples – of people who made or a making or are trying to make a REAL DIFFERENCE, and the narcissistic pretenders and utopianists who have accomplished NOTHING, or nothing good:

REAL DO-GOODER:

Reagan – he defeated the USSR,
and saved the spirit and economy of the USA,
and he saved the Free World

PERSON WHO WANTS YOU TO THINK THEY’RE A DO-GOODER:

Gorbachev – he tried to save the USSR

REAL DO-GOODER:

Petraeus – well, you know the rest

PERSON WHO WANTS YOU TO THINK THEY’RE A DO-GOODER:

Wes Clark – he panders to the Kossacks and actually ASPIRES to be a Veep while parroting the defeatist dem line

REAL DO-GOODER:

Justice Thomas: defender of the Constitution –
including the 1st and 2nd Amendments

PERSON WHO WANTS YOU TO THINK THEY’RE A DO-GOODER:

McCain – who had trampled on the 1st Amendment and would limit the 2nd,
and tax the crap out of us to stop global climate change

REAL DO-GOODER:

Ayaan

OOPS NOT THAT HAYEK, THIS ONE!

Fred Hayek proved that socialism is INEVITABLY the road to serfdom
  blog it