This is apparently a straightforward proposal from a supposedly “free” country:
The UK’s tax collection agency is putting forth a proposal that all employers send employee paychecks to the government, after which the government would deduct what it deems as the appropriate tax and pay the employees by bank transfer.
Of course, this presupposes:
- all money belongs to government
- all taxpayers are cheats who are keeping the government from all the money they are owed
- only government can understand what part of your money you actually need
- increasing taxes will be very simple with this system
- you are a groveling peasant who owes your very existence to the state
Would anybody please explain how this is much different from communism? Shoot – even Cuba is cutting people off the government payrolls. But this supposedly “free” “Western” “free market” country could actually propose this as any action government would be allowed to perform?
Well Britain has been circling the drain for a long time, if they actually do this you can simply write them off as lost to civilization.
Bring it on Maggie!
I guess this is a preview of coming attractions – but from the UK we get:
Housing officials have ordered tenants to remove welcome mats from their doorsteps – claiming they are health and safety hazards.
Residents received a letter saying the mats were potentially dangerous and were being banned, amid fears people might trip over them and sue for damages.
The note read: ‘(Doormats) being left in communal areas is a serious health and safety issue and is a fire safety risk.’
At what point does this insanity end. Should everyone be bubble-wrapped? I love the government excuse given:
Guy Cresswell, director of housing services at Great Places Housing Group, said: ‘Government legislation requires us to carry out fire risk assessments and to comply in full with recommendations made.
‘This work has been carried out for us by expert independent assessors. Our fire risk assessor recommended that doormats outside of people’s homes at Gaskell Rise should be removed because people could trip up over them.
The people living there think its insane, but they have no recourse. So the mats go.
So let’s run a little simulation. You are the lunch lady at an elementary school. You are going through the yard of said school and find 4 boys have tied a girls hands and feet and are whipping her with a jump rope. You stop them, untie the girl, report the kids to the principal.
To my mind that’s pretty heroic. Whether its a girl or a boy being beaten with a rope it might be a good thing.
Then later that week you see the girl’s parents in the local grocery store and you tell them you were so sorry that the incident had happened. Unfortunately it turns out that the school authorities are lying pigs and they hadn’t informed the parents about what actually happened. It was a “jump rope incident” and the terrified girl hadn’t told her parents the whole truth (maybe because she was intimidated by the authorities?). The parents are rightly outraged at not being told just how serious an incident this is and they go to the pusillanimous dirtbags at the school to ask what had happened and why they were lied to.
And the only action that the school administation takes is to FIRE YOU!
Sound impossible – not in what used to be Great Britain.
When staff at Great Tey Primary School, near Colchester in Essex, discovered what she had done, she was accused of breaching pupil confidentiality and suspended.
Earlier this year it was reported that the London borough of Haringey had used a spy plane to record residents’ energy use patterns:
- Thermal images of homes have been taken by a light aircraft fitted with military spy technology to record the heat escaping from people’s houses.Maps identifying individual homes have now been placed on the internet to encourage occupiers to reduce their wastage and carbon emissions by fitting insulation and turning the thermostat down.
- An aircraft, fitted with a military-style thermal imager, flew over the borough 17 times to take pictures of almost every house in the area.Footage of heat loss was converted into stills, then laid over a map of the area, before each house was given colour-coded ratings.
Homes that were losing the most heat were represented as bright red on the map. The least wasteful households were shown in deep blue. Shades of paler blues and reds were used to show grades of heat loss.
A formal complaint about Google’s Street View has been sent to the Information Commissioner (ICO).
Drawn up by lobby group Privacy International (PI), it cites more than 200 reports from members of the public identifiable via the service.
PI wants Street View shut down while the ICO investigates the service.
“The ICO has repeatedly made clear that it believes that in Street View the necessary safeguards are in place to protect people’s privacy,” said Google.
Privacy International (PI) director Simon Davies said his organisation had filed the complaint given the “clear embarrassment and damage” Street View had caused to many Britons.
Active government invasion of your privacy is OK, recording public views of the streets isn’t.
Britain is a strange, strange country any more.
“… never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never — in nothing, great or small, large or petty – never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.”
From the UK Times:
Only 10 sharia courts there? One would have assumed there were more:
Ten currently operate across the country, with around 95 per cent of their cases relating to matrimonial issues.
Although the hearings have no basis in British law, they are attended voluntarily by Muslim couples to settle disputes without referral to the recognised authorities.
In some cases they can order wives to be more attentive to their husbands’ needs, or deal with releasing spouses from bad or forced marriages.
The first Muslim court was established in Birmingham in 1982 and others have followed in London and the Yorkshire towns of Rotherham and Dewsbury.
Although most of those who attend are from the Indian sub-continent, Sharia courts are also popular among those from Arab and Somalian backgrounds.
So will the openeing ceremonies in London required burkhas for women? One simply speculates based on trends.
Of course as Rachel Lucas points out – unarmed police are about as useless as tits on a bull if the mob decides that they don’t want to obey them:
For the love of God, Britain. You really, really, really, really need to grow your balls back.
A good first step would be to arm your police. I know it sounds all hillbillyish and redneckian, but there’s something called “deterrence.” It’s this crazy concept we uncivilized rubes over here in ‘Murrica apply in order to give our law enforcement the ability to, you know, enforce the law.
But the wimps there have learned their lessons. For example they don’t want to use the word MOB (as in group of people rioting against the public order and beating up two cops) because that might be inflammatory:
“Whilst we would never use the word ‘mob’ which is an inflammatory word, we can confirm that eye witnesses have described their initial fear that officers were going to be seriously injured or killed.”
and Rachel shows what will probably be the followup:
I expect the followup article to this one to explain how the injured officers are being sued for inflaming the rage of the crowd, and maybe even a few arrests will be made of the witnesses for hate speech because they described the scene as “horrifying.”
The British do make a habit of locking up people who actually defend themselves and their property.
Get out while you can – those of you who don’t want to be paying jizya in a few years.