This is an ad considered “too controversial” for the Chicago Tribune, USA Today, and the LA Times (well of course nothing pro-life gets into the LA times)
Top 10 Books
Most overhyped book of 2010 – Freedom by Jonathan Franzen – by a wide, wide, wide margin
Top 10 TV Shows You Aren’t Watching But Should
Only TV comedy at which you might actually laugh – The Big Bang Theory
Most Disgusting TV Reflection on the Decline of American Civilization – Cougar Town
Top 10 Movies
Top 10 Signs of the Apocylypse
Least Surprising News of 2010 – California faces multi-billion dollar budget hole
Most Surprising News of 2010 – 63 seat wipeout is just ho-hum for a week or so and then back to “Democrats in Charge”
What a glorious Sunday morning we all just had – aside from the notice that the Democrats had to sneak through their Obamacare monstrosity in the middle of the night regardless of what the American people wish – in all the lovely clips of the disgusting pile of filth Diana DeGette clamoring for the right to murder babies with government money.
Of course, she does represent the Communist People’s Republic of Boulder, but she’s willing to destroy the Obamacare deal in total rather than allow restrictions on public money (including fungible money being swapped from “private” to “public” use) in providing abortion. Her latest press release says:
PRO-CHOICE MEMBERS VOW TO OPPOSE HEALTH CARE BILL THAT RESTRICS A WOMAN’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE ANY FURTHER THAN CURRENT LAW
Amendment Effectively Bans Abortion Coverage in All Plans in the Exchange, including the Public Health Insurance Options and All Private Health Insurance Plans
and in her letter to the Queen Bee of the House she flatly says she will screw the bill if it comes back from compromise with the “Stupack language” in it:
The Stupak-Pitts amendment to H.R. 3962, The Affordable Healthcare for America Act, represents an unprecedented and unacceptable restriction on women’s ability to access the full range of reproductive health services to which they are lawfully entitled. We will not vote for a conference report that contains language that restricts women’s right to choose any further than current law.
See, there are things that Democrats want more than “providing insurance for everyone”. If it doesn’t include the right to murder the unborn, then its not worth supporting.
Eighteen and pregnant, Sycloria Williams went to an abortion clinic outside Miami and paid $1,200 for Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.
Three days later, she sat in a reclining chair, medicated to dilate her cervix and otherwise get her ready for the procedure.
Only Renelique didn’t arrive in time. According to Williams and the Florida Department of Health, she went into labor and delivered a live baby girl.
This is very similar to a situation that Our New President, The Most Holy and Chosen Egoness, voted on 3 times in the Illinois State Senate. And his answer was very simple – the woman came to kill the baby, the baby should die. And that seems to have been the answer in this case:
What Williams and the Health Department say happened next has shocked people on both sides of the abortion debate: One of the clinic’s owners, who has no medical license, cut the infant’s umbilical cord. Williams says the woman placed the baby in a plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.
Police recovered the decomposing remains in a cardboard box a week later after getting anonymous tips.
Please explain to me why people on BOTH sides of the abortion debate are shocked by this. Why wouldn’t pro-choicers stand up and say “What’s so bad about this? Its the object of an abortion – its just a lifeless clump of cells and its no one’s business but this knocked up 18-year old. ” I don’t think that both sides of the abortion debate are shocked at all. I think that the pro-abortion bunch is simply mad that this information got out.
The complaint says one of the clinic owners, Belkis Gonzalez came in and cut the umbilical cord with scissors, then placed the baby in a plastic bag, and the bag in a trash can.
Williams’ lawsuit offers a cruder account: She says Gonzalez knocked the baby off the recliner chair where she had given birth, onto the floor. The baby’s umbilical cord was not clamped, allowing her to bleed out. Gonzalez scooped the baby, placenta and afterbirth into a red plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.
The only problem from the abortionists point of view is that this disposal of a baby happened outside the woman’s uterus rather than inside it. The object of the exercise was a dead baby in a plastic bag.
And no quibbling about what was inside of this woman’s womb. The article notes:
At 23 weeks, an otherwise healthy fetus would have a slim but legitimate chance of survival. Quadruplets born at 23 weeks last year at The Nebraska Medical Center survived.
This was the planned murder of a baby. The real tragedy is that had this “doctor” shown up on time and performed his murder while it was inside the woman it would simply be called “choice”. And that choice happens all the time in America, every day.
There’s lots and lots of lood on the hands of “abortion providers”, and Harry Blackmun will be washing his hands of it forever.
Very controversial, eh? I guess reminding people that many babies like those who grew up to be the President are aborted every single day.