Liberal Fairy Tales

The modern take on some old ideas:

• The socio-economically advantaged young woman and the pea
• The visually challenged duckling and how stereotypes hurt us all
• Goldilocks and her hurtful imperialist exploitation of 3 harmless bears
• The pigmentally challenged lady and 7 vertically challenged men who are still fully capable individuals in their own right
• The capitalist explotation and degredation of Rumpelstiltskin
• Rapunzel and the negative body images of today’s young women
• Sleeping Beauty and the environmentally unfriendly use of apples
• The old woman who lived in a shoe and was deined access to proper pregnancy counseling and health care
• Hansel and Gretel and their lack of compassion for women of a certain age
• Jack and Jill and the heartbreaking lack of government supported health care for uninsured individuals who fall down

Detroit or Mogadishu?

clipped from tehresistance.wordpress.com Can you distinguish the most liberal city in America, ruled by the hard-left for forty years, from a third-world hellhole devastated by two decades of civil war? 1. Detroit or Mogadishu? 2. Mogadishu or Detroit? 3. Detroit or Mogadishu? 4. Mogadishu or Detroit? 5. Detroit or Mogadishu? 6. Mogadishu or Detroit? 7. Detroit or Mogadishu? 8. Mogadishu or Detroit? 9. Detroit or Mogadishu? 10. Mogadishu or Detroit? Answers: Mogadishu – 1,3,5,7,9; Detroit – 2,4,6,8,10

The Truth About Liberalism

I’ve been chewing over this wonderful little missive from the socialism according to David Sirota:

I know I should be mortified by the lobbyist-organized mobs of angry Brooks Brothers mannequins who are now making headlines by shutting down congressional town hall meetings. I know I should be despondent during this, the Khaki Pants Offensive in the Great American Health Care and Tax War. And yet, I’m euphorically repeating one word over and over again with a big grin on my face.

Finally.

Finally, there’s no pretense. Finally, the Me-First, Screw-Everyone-Else Crowd’s ugliest traits are there for all to behold.

Let’s run through the list:

1.  denigration of protesters who are too well dressed – check

2. setting up strawman that opposing socialism and healthcare takover by Obama and the government is simply selfishness – check

3. implication that only those who want to steal somebody else’s money to “give” “free” “healthcare” to those who won’t pay for it – check

Its very rare that liberals will flat come out and say so clearly that a) you have something they want and b) they will steal it from you at the barrel of a gun.

What They Will Scream: But 38.5 percent is disproportionately high! See? You’ve proved that the rich “contribute more than their share” of taxes!

What You Should Say: Actually, they are paying almost exactly “their share.” According to the data, the wealthiest 5 percent of America pays 38.5 percent of the total taxes precisely because they make just about that share — a whopping 36.5 percent! — of total national income.

Note that a) this admits that the ‘rich’ are already paying a disproportionate share of taxes and b) these stats don’t include the complete and utter rape that will occur if the Democrat plan as proposed in the house passes.

So if you want to actually keep the money you earn – and note he’s saying that whatever you are paying now its not enough – you are just a Me-First Selfish person.

Of course, he reveals himself as a thief, but that’s the truth of liberalism.<.p>

Liberal Logic

Another great one from Ann Coulter:

It’s something in liberals’ DNA: They think they can pass a law eliminating guns and nuclear weapons, but teenagers having sex is completely beyond our control.

Tammy Bruce Unloads on America-Hating Liberals

Way to go girl – we need to get you on Red Eye

Human Rights Watch – Just Another America and Israel Bashing Liberal Organization

The article at the Jerusalem Post notes:

Seventeen blown apart shopping in Istanbul; eight children gunned down at a Jerusalem school; 58 slaughtered in front of the Indian Embassy in Kabul. These are just some examples of the terrorist atrocities that plagued the world in the past year. Yet NGO superpower Human Rights Watch, winner of this year’s UN Prize for Human Rights, did not find these incidents of mass murder and violations of the most sacred of human rights, the right to life, significant enough to merit a single comment. Instead, it spends millions attacking Western democracies for doing their best to protect civil liberties and fight terror in an age where its perpetrators have no respect for human life and are driven purely by hate and religious fanaticism.

Just another leftist anti-American, anti-Israel, pro-selfhateing bunch.  You go to their website just today (find it on your own – I don’t want to give them any help) and there are links about how US Trade shouldn’t actually expand (and therefore make everyone in the world better off), bashing Israel over Palestinian land rights (and saying nothing about the murder of Jews by Palestinians at all), blah blah blah blah.  Pick your liberal shibboleth and there is your link.

Just as Amnesty International is concerned only with American violations of terrorist rights, so Human Rights Watch becomes yet nother turd in the bucket of liberal organizations.

Are You Gullible Enough To Be A Liberal?

Did you honestly believe the following:

1.  “I did not have sexual relations with that woman?”

2.  Do you still believe Bill Clinton didn’t have sex with Monica?

3.  Did you believe Bill Axelrod when he said that Obama and Blagojevitch talked about who would replace Obama in the Senate?

4.  Did you believe Obama when he said he never spoke to Blago about his replacment?

5.  Did you believe Axelrod when he said he “misspoke”?

6.  Did you believe Rhambo Emmanuel when he said he never spoke with Blagojevitch about Obama’s Senate Replacement?

7.  Did you believe that Obama would be faced with an ethics scandal before even being inaugurated?

Yesses – 6 or more – its dangerous to let you vote

2-5 – you are a liberal

0-1 (assuming the 1 is number 7) you are a functioning adult

What the Election Is About – Liberals

Heaven help us:

“We owe the rest of the world an apology for the last eight years. We can start to make it up by electing Barack Obama.” Those words, spoken to a Daily Telegraph reporter by a lawyer interviewed in Tampa, Florida, chillingly illustrate the strain of masochistic insanity that seems to have gripped part of the American electorate.

So, now we know what this election is really about. It is not about helping the Joes – Six-Pack or the Plumber – in Peoria. It is about appeasing the Fritzes in Düsseldorf, the Ivans in Moscow and the Wus in Beijing. That explains why Obama campaigned in Berlin. Such a deluded, liberal, self-hating mentality would be understandable in times of prosperity; but Americans’ houses are being repossessed, their bank loans withdrawn and their savings shrunk. It beggars belief that some voters are more concerned about pleasing their enemies than reconstructing their country.

Fiscal Liberals

Interesting that with Kaleefornia having a raft of tax-raising, green power mandating, budget busting initiatives on its ballot, Pravda By the Bay finds fiscal problems with these two:

Prop. 6 would increase an array of sentences on crimes related to street gangs, drug dealing and guns. For example, a gang member convicted of a violent felony would get an extra 10 years in prison. Accomplices in crimes in which a gun was used – such as a drive-by shooting – would be subjected to the same enhanced penalties as the shooter. It would increase the penalties on gang-related graffiti and prohibit illegal immigrants arrested for violent felonies or gang crimes from being released on bail without a hearing.

Prop. 9, designed to strengthen the rights of victims and to make it more difficult to release inmates from prison, also would have an enormous budget impact. It expands the victims’ rights that were approved by voters in 1982.

Now, their opposition isn’t to the idea of putting and keeping criminals in prison.  That just sort of skates by.  The big problem that Pravda has with this is it would cost money to keep these thugs in prison.

May I ask a question here – if its too expensive to provide safety for your citizens, then just what in the world do you think government is for?  Its rather obvious that keeping the murderers, rapists, and thugs out of the society of those who want to live in lawful peace just is too much of a stretch for a government that sponsors state-paid day care.

Again – we only hope that Kaleefornia keeps up the crazy.  Raise taxes, put impossible mandates in place, increase regulation, implement the whole of the progressive agenda.

We can always use the business here in Colorado.

The Media Review

Some rough language, but you shouldn’t be drinking or eating anything as you watch this one or your monitor will be messed up: