Name That Party
There is no need to play the parlor game, “What party is this person a member of?” with this Associated Press story by Lara Jakes Jordan:
Congressman Charged in Land Deal
Republican Rep. Rick Renzi was indicted Friday on charges of extortion, wire fraud, money laundering
Jordan’s story on the indictment of Congressman William Jefferson (D-LA) made no direct reference to his party affiliation (the standalone undated print version is here with Lara Jakes’s byline; the indicated authors of the same story dated June 4, 2007 are Lara Jakes Jordan and Matthew Barakat).
Jordan instead required curious readers to make it to the ninth paragraph, and then to infer that Jefferson must be a member of the same party as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi:
A former congressional candidate convicted of faking his disappearance after a car crash two years ago said Thursday the verdict was devastating, but said the case isn’t over.
Look for Paragraph 4 to note that he was a Democrat Candidate for Congress
1 Comment »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- June 2009 (18)
- May 2009 (19)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (27)
- February 2009 (32)
- January 2009 (36)
- December 2008 (26)
- November 2008 (22)
- October 2008 (28)
- September 2008 (35)
- August 2008 (43)
- July 2008 (32)
-
Categories
- abortion
- ACLU
- adult stem cells
- Afganistan
- AIDS
- Al Gore
- American Criminal Liberties Union
- architecture
- astronaut
- Australia
- Bad Poetry
- Barack Obama
- Basic Economics
- Battlestar Galactica
- Bill Richardson
- Canada
- Charles Schumer
- China
- Christian
- Christmas
- CIA
- Clinton Lies
- Clueless
- Colorado
- Colorado Senators
- Congressional District 5
- conservatives
- Constitutional Amendment
- Crime
- Cuba
- Culture
- Culture of Death
- Culture of Surrender
- cute
- Darwin Award Winner
- Dead Stream Media
- Democractic Communist People's Republic
- Democrat Convention 2008
- Democrats
- Denmark
- dogs
- EcoFreaks
- ecoNazis
- economy
- Education
- El Paso Republicans
- Election 2006
- Election 2008
- Energy
- England
- English Language
- environment
- EUnuchs
- EuroIslamists
- evolution
- Family
- fashion
- Feminism
- FNS
- Follow
- France
- Freedom
- future
- General Businss
- Germany
- Global Warming
- government
- Government as Idiocy
- Government Benefits
- Great Britain
- Great Britain Civilisation
- Guilt
- Gun Ban
- Hamas
- Health Care
- hearings
- Hero
- Hillary Clinton
- history
- Hollyweird
- Home School
- Homeland Security
- Homeless
- Humor
- idiots
- Immigration
- Intifada
- Iran
- Iraq
- Israel
- IT
- Japan
- John McCain
- Junk Science
- Jurisprudence
- Kennedy
- Lawyers
- Liberals
- Malaysia
- McCain
- Me
- Media
- Medicare
- Medicine
- Michelle Obama
- Military
- Music
- Muslim
- Nancy Pelosi
- nature
- Nobel Idiocy
- North Korea
- Norway
- NPR
- Nutroots
- Obamagasm
- oil
- Olympics
- Palestinians
- People's Republic of Boulder
- photoshop
- Political Correctness
- poverty
- Predictions
- privacy
- progressives
- Public Education
- Quote of the Day
- Republicans
- Robots
- Russia
- San Francisco
- Science
- Social Security
- Space
- Spain
- Sports
- Squirrels
- State Department
- Stem Cells
- Super Bowl
- Syria
- taxes
- Technology
- Top 10
- Transportation
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- University
- US Marines
- US Navy
- venezuela
- Voting
- War on Christianity
- War on Terror
- Watcher of Weasels
- Weasels
- Whining
- work
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS











Your comparison is apparently correct. Does this mean you will now comment on similar presentations by conservative media and commentators? It would be refreshing if all you partisan hacks (you are one–until you prove differently by fairly applying your criticisms to both sides) would give the news straight. Example: Fox News frequent placement of (D) with name of criminally exposed (R) politicians. You accuse a journalist of wrongful actions which you tolerate without comment from your favored side. Shame on you. Did you find the reported facts to be in error, or were you just trying to deflect attention from the facts by complaining about less relevant details?