Colorado Right

Living Right under the Peak

Sure Hope She Gets Ownership of Craigslist

The hippy-dippy website Craigslist had the following:

In online ad offering everything in the house for free left one landlord with quite a shock. By the time she realized what was going on, the house had been stripped of its light fixtures, hot water heater — even the kitchen sink.Laurie Raye said she traced the damage to a fake ad on craigslist, a San Francisco-based Internet site for classifieds.

“The instigator who published this ad invited the public to come in and vandalize me,” Raye told Seattle television station KING. She said the rental home wasn’t occupied at the time because she had recently evicted a tenant, but it had other items inside.

Even the front door and a vinyl window were pilfered, Raye said.

“In the ad, it said come and take what you want. Everything is free,” she said. “Please help yourself to anything on the property.”

And you know the response from the loving, caring folks at this “online community” would be:

Raye said she contacted craigslist and received an e-mail saying officials would need a subpoena or search warrant to release information about who posted the ad.

I hope she sues the “operators” of this caring little community into the ground. And that the scumbag who originally put up this ad gets a long stretch in jail.

April 5, 2007 - Posted by coloradoright | Culture, Jurisprudence, Lawyers, Liberals | | 9 Comments

9 Comments »

  1. Why should she sue Craigslist? They had nothing to do with this. The responsibility lies squarely on the shoulders of the person who posted the ad.

    Craigslist is not some “hippy-dippy” little website, it’s putting newspapers out of buisness because of all the classified ads they have, and they are the biggest job-board provider in the world. Bigger than Monster.com, Careerbuilder, etc.

    Comment by RightWingersSuckAss | April 6, 2007 | Reply

  2. Sue Craigslit? She probably will, but only if she’s a liberal. Isn’t that idea sort of like sueing the gun companies when criminals use guns during crimes?

    Comment by John | April 6, 2007 | Reply

  3. With your logic, people should sue automobile manufacturers for drivers committing crimes in vehicles. Sounds pretty dumb, doesn’t it?

    What turned the majority of Americans into such whiney, loud-mouthed, lawsuit happy douche bags?

    Comment by dave | April 6, 2007 | Reply

  4. So the fact that people vandalized a home makes it okay to sue and take down Craigslist because it’s, in your words, “hippy-dippy”?

    It’s very unpatriotic to advocate ill will on your fellow Americans. You are almost as bad as a terrorist advocating such.

    Comment by Tim | April 6, 2007 | Reply

  5. Wow. How did Colorado end up with so many religious right fruitloops?

    Comment by john H | April 6, 2007 | Reply

  6. Um, this is off topic, but you have a picutre on this page that says “I will not surrender/I will not submit.” Why would you have that on your site? Who cares? Are we to watching out for people with this phrase printed on their t-shirts? If they have it printed on their t-shirts does that make them terrorists? does it make it likely they are terrorists?

    The reason I ask is I see similar sayings printed in English on shirst in the States all the time. The phrase “No Fear” comes to mind. Saying you have no fear is essentially saying you will not surrender or submit (though, it seems to be little more than macho postering; I have yet to meet someone wearing a “no fear” t-shirt willing to take me up on my offer of playing russian roulet with an automatic pistol and they go first). And then there a several others (and bumper-stickers) that actually include the words no, surrender and submit/submission that I will not document because I’m sure you have seen them as well.

    So are we to fear this phrase only in Arabic? Should we use it as a reason to arrest/detain an individual just because they have a t-shirt with this printed on it?

    IS FREEDOM OF SPEECH ONLY FOR ENGLISH SPEAKERS?

    or

    Are you simply scared of what you don’t understand?

    Comment by WorseThanNormal | April 6, 2007 | Reply

  7. Buy a window buy a door, it will be cheaper than pursuing a lawsuit you will inevitably lose. This lady is the one who is hippy-dippy!!!

    Comment by paula | April 9, 2007 | Reply

  8. Our laws give us the right and privilege to sue anyone, for anything, for any amount. Sad to say, any common sense does not enter into this right given us. Even sadder is jury’s award large monitory settlements for things like this unfortunate incident. Just because a company, business, or a individual has made it financially in this life, the attitude is to get our share of the pie and it does not matter if they are responsible or not.

    Comment by John | April 22, 2007 | Reply

  9. I definitely not a sue happy individual but this one… With the way technology currently is, craigslist should have some kind of safe guard against articles such as this being submitted. A guy just last month got wiped out by a similar add that was used to cover up a burglary. I am conservative and all for the rights of a business but the negligence here is on the shoulder of craigslist for not screening out ads such as this. Apparently no action has been taken by craigslist to stop these kinds of ads since someone posted another one just last month. Something needs to be done about this and it is far easier to put the burden on the company that the millions of users.

    Comment by Mark | April 8, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment